Reevaluating Governance Style in Africa for Progress

  • 0

The style of government in many nations, irrespective of the continent, goes a long way towards affecting a nation’s development. Africa is a continent that has not been left out of this, as it has experienced its fair share of difficulties with its government style. Although it has a great deal of promise, it nevertheless struggles with leadership issues, institutional weaknesses, political unrest, and economic and institutional instability.

This article will examine the prevailing governmental style in Africa, consider its merits and demerits, the challenges of these rules, and offer some possible solutions to help improve the continent’s political, institutional, and economic progress to achieve sustainable growth and development.

Forms of Government in Africa:

Africa is mainly made up of unitary, federal, and monarchical government forms, with unitary governance styles dominating on the continent.

The unitary form of government

The central government is the ultimate authority of a unitary form of government, which is characterised by sovereign nations operating as a single body. Sub-national units, or administrative divisions, can be established or eliminated under a unitary type of government. Only the authority that the national government decides to provide these subnational bodies is used.

With a strong central authority that oversees the actions of sub-national governments, a unitary style of government is one kind of governance. All authority is also placed in the hands of the central government under this system of governance. Other countries that use this system of government include Zimbabwe, Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco.


The duties and powers of the government are usually very distinct in a unitary type of government. Faster responses and help are frequently seen in times of crisis when there is a clear division of power, as opposed to when there is a division of power across several different government entities.


As a result, there is a risk that it could lead to a totalitarian form of governance where all authority is held by a single person. It also leads to hyper-centrism, alienation from local concerns, and these negative effects.

Federal Form of Government

In contrast, the federal system of governance divides governmental authority between the federal government and the state and municipal governments. Each level of government in a federal system has sovereignty over some things while sharing control over others.

For instance, the ability to tax is a power shared by the federal and state governments, yet the ability to declare war or take other similar actions is a power reserved for the federal government. The federal government form has been used in a number of nations, including Nigeria, Ethiopia, South Africa, Sudan, and Cameroon.


One benefit of federalism or a federal government system is that it fosters innovative policymaking, political involvement, and tolerance for differences of opinion. Due to the fact that the federal government system establishes two levels of government with the power to act, failure to achieve a desired policy goal at one level can be compensated for by winning the support of elected officials at a different level. As a result, everyone is urged to actively participate in shaping public policy, including individuals, groups, and social movements.


There are disadvantages to federalism as well. It can hinder federal efforts to solve national issues by causing cross-state economic and social inequities, increasing inequalities between states, and sparking a race to the bottom among states.

Styles of Government in Africa

Two dominant styles of government in Africa have existed for decades. These are authoritarian and democratic rules. Many African nations have experienced authoritarian rule but gravitated towards democratic rule after gaining independence. However, there have been coups that resulted in the military taking over because of the failure of democratic leaders to serve their nations as expected.

One major difference between the authoritarian and democratic styles of government lies in the means and impact of its rule on its citizens. While authoritarian rule comes at the expense of political liberties and human rights, authoritarianism can bring about stability. On the other hand, democracy encourages involvement but can be difficult to implement well.

Is there a need for a review of the style of government in Africa?
Good governance globally and especially in Africa requires a fair legal framework that is enforced impartially. It also requires full protection of human rights, particularly those of minorities, and impartial enforcement of laws, which requires an independent judiciary and an incorruptible security service.

It is imperative to note that any country within the African region that fails to fulfil or manifest these good governance requirements falls short of what good governance is about and hence should be subjected to a review in the style of its governance. In addition, a good government should be participatory, consensus-oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive, effective, equitable, and law-abiding, with the demonstration of a collective strategic vision.

Challenges for African Governments:

Persistent development challenges

Poverty, underdevelopment, and poor access to basic amenities continue to be major problems for many African countries. The necessity for a reevaluation of governance structures and policies that can successfully handle these problems is indicated by these problems.

Political Instability

Coup attempts, civil wars, and election disputes are all common occurrences in some African nations’ political environments. These problems obstruct government, slow economic expansion, and jeopardise citizen security.

Mismanagement and corruption

Corruption is still a major problem in many African countries. A shortage of funding for key services is frequently caused by poor management of public resources and financial theft, which discourages foreign investment and undermines development initiatives.

Weak Institutions

Weak institutional frameworks, such as ineffective judicial systems and bureaucratic inefficiency, obstruct the provision of public services and the application of the rule of law; this weakness can promote inequality and impede development.

Authoritarianism and Lack of Accountability

In some cases, authoritarian regimes stifle political freedoms, suppress dissent, and limit accountability; these actions can ultimately result in a lack of transparency.

Solutions to improve Africa’s economic, political, institutional, and leadership development:

Africa’s economic development

Africa’s economic development can be improved by reducing reliance on a few key commodities, diversifying its economy, maintaining stable inflation rates, adopting responsible fiscal policies, and establishing a stable monetary system in order to foster investment and a stable business environment.

Additionally, the promotion of entrepreneurship involves facilitating access to funding, lowering administrative obstacles, and aiding start-ups. Because access to inexpensive financial services, such as banking, credit, and microfinance, may empower people and spur economic activity, it is important to foster an atmosphere where innovation can flourish.

It is essential to note that the emergence of the African Continental free trade area (AFCFTA) will improve economic activities among African countries and bring some 1.3 billion traders together on the continent, relieving them of some trade restrictions. This will foster the growth of business activities on the continent. More of this will make the African continent economically strong.

Africa’s Political Development

African countries must invest in establishing powerful and independent judiciaries, electoral commissions, and monitoring organisations in order to improve democratic institutions and advance their political growth. In order to prevent political involvement in institutions, nations must ensure the rule of law is preserved.

Promoting transparent and accountable governance methods, fostering open data projects, holding public officials accountable for their activities, and enacting comprehensive anti-corruption measures are all further ways to encourage good governance and accountability. Combating corruption, bolstering the rule of law, and making sure that institutions are efficient and receptive are all crucial.

To reduce ethnic and tribal divisions and create policies that meet the needs of all citizens, regardless of their background, it is also important to encourage inclusive leadership and policies.

Africa’s institutional development

To ensure checks and balances among state or government institutions, a competent body must regularly conduct an institutional audit and conduct a thorough background check on every appointee who leads any state institution to gather sufficient information about their qualifications. When heads of institutions are accused of corruption and other similar violations, deliberate action must be taken to punish them.

Despite playing a significant role, Africa’s governance practices are not the only cause of the continent’s stalled progress. While there is no one approach that works for all countries, a comprehensive strategy that emphasises advancing democratic institutions, encouraging good governance, and encouraging inclusion in leadership and public policy can be a positive beginning.

Africa’s great potential must be unlocked to create the conditions for long-term economic, political, and institutional progress; hence, it is time for the continent’s governments to assess and modify their governance practices jointly.


Navigating Ghana’s economy through thick and thin
Prev Post Navigating Ghana’s economy through thick and thin
Hon. Jonathan Fonati Koffa’s Gender Equity SDG efforts
Next Post Hon. Jonathan Fonati Koffa’s Gender Equity SDG efforts