The oceans have long been the arteries of global commerce; today those arteries are carrying not only cargo but complex digital systems. As the shipping and port sectors digitise, the seam between sea and cyberspace has become the new front line of risk.
Maritime commerce has always relied on predictable routes and functioning choke points. What has changed is the degree to which those routes and nodes depend on software, networks and remotely managed systems. Vessel navigation, cargo manifests, port operating systems, terminal operating systems and coastal intermodal links now sit astride layers of information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT). When those layers are compromised, ships cannot berth, containers cannot be processed and the economic ripple effects reach far inland. The risk is not abstract. Global reporting and maritime security practitioners have documented a steady escalation in maritime cyber activity over the last half-decade, and the industry’s increased connectivity has created attractive targets for criminal groups and state-aligned actors alike.
READ ALSO: A New Pact in Africa: Restoring Trust in Security Forces
How Code Commandeers Ships
Cyber incidents at sea present in many guises. An infection that locks booking systems forces a line to switch to manual processing, delaying cargo and raising costs. A targeted ransomware campaign can deny an operator access to its scheduling or billing platforms. Manipulation of navigation aids, GPS spoofing or interference with onboard control systems can endanger life and property. Even attacks that are confined to shore-side data centres ripple into the supply chain: cargo manifests, bills of lading and scheduling platforms are the lifeblood of trade, and their disruption has a direct impact on firms, workers and consumers.
Africa depends on sea transport in a profound way. The continent’s import and export trade is overwhelmingly maritime, a reality that makes ports strategic economic assets for both coastal and landlocked countries. Ports such as Durban, Tanger-Med, Mombasa and Djibouti serve regional markets and act as lifelines for neighbours that lack direct coastal access. As demographic and climatic pressures increase, the role of maritime logistics will intensify.
Population dynamics matter because they shape demand. Projections show that sub Saharan Africa’s population will grow substantially this century and is expected to approach or exceed the region’s capacity thresholds in critical decades ahead. Urbanisation and a growing coastal population will place new burdens on port throughput and on systems that manage the movement of people and food. At the same time, climate projections point to material risks for agricultural productivity across many parts of the continent, increasing reliance on maritime imports to maintain food security. Those two trends, heavier demand on maritime logistics and greater vulnerability in food supply, mean that cyber disruption to ports is not merely an economic inconvenience; it becomes a human-security issue with potential humanitarian consequences.
Faultlines In The Shore: Africa’s Cyber Readiness
Research and practitioner assessments indicate that Africa faces distinct cyber-preparedness challenges in the maritime domain. There is a relative paucity of Africa-specific research that maps threat actors, system vulnerabilities and incident response pathways tailored to the continent’s port and coastal infrastructure. Institutional fragmentation, limited technical capacity, constrained budgets and uneven regulatory frameworks compound the problem. For many coastal states, immediate priorities include modernising port infrastructure and improving logistics efficiency; cyber security often competes for scarce resources and is sometimes treated as a downstream concern.
That said, a number of African states and regional bodies have begun to act. Continental instruments exist to set norms for cybercrime and data protection, while regional economic communities and national administrations are at various stages of developing strategies and capabilities. Experience elsewhere shows that these efforts are most effective when they are harmonised and integrated into wider maritime security planning rather than treated as an add on.
Borrowed Charts: Global Policies And Lessons For Africa
International and regional examples supply a pragmatic set of lessons. The International Maritime Organization has issued formal guidance that encourages integration of cyber risk management into safety and security systems. Regional arrangements, in Southeast Asia, Europe and other theatres have demonstrated the value of shared incident reporting, joint exercises and harmonised standards for ports and shipping firms. Private-sector actors, including classification societies, insurers and managed service providers, have developed tools and playbooks that accelerate detection and recovery. These approaches underscore a central truth: cyber security cannot be achieved in isolation. It requires co-ownership across flag states, ports, carriers, supply-chain partners and insurers.
Anchoring Policy: Institutions, Standards And Cooperation
A credible response has several interlocking pillars. At the international level, maritime governance must continue to push baseline expectations for risk management and incident reporting. At regional level, economic communities and sub regional organisations are well placed to align technical assistance and to harmonise rules that cross borders. At national level, governments must adopt legal frameworks that clarify responsibilities, incentivise risk reduction and facilitate lawful cooperation with foreign partners when incidents cross jurisdictions.
Crucially, this architecture should not centralise to the point of creating single points of failure. A federated, layered model, where local operational capability is reinforced by regional support centres and interoperable incident response arrangements will be more resilient. Public private partnerships are pivotal: ports and shipping companies own much of the hardware and software; states supply legal authority and international standing; insurers and financiers provide market incentives; and technology vendors offer detection and mitigation capabilities.
What To Do Now
Short-term operational priorities include the following sequence of actions: first, mandate cyber risk assessments for all major ports and for significant vessel classes operating in national waters. Second, require the adoption of the IMO’s cyber risk guidance and integrate cyber risk into national port contingency plans. Third, set up secure channels for timely information-sharing between ports, national CERTs and regional partners. Fourth, ensure that insurers, flag states and port operators adopt standard incident classification and reporting templates so that responses can be coordinated and lessons captured.
Medium-term steps should include incentives for workforce development, the creation of regional SOCs (security operations centres) accessible to smaller states, and the harmonisation of legal frameworks to enable cross-border investigations and evidence-sharing. Longer-term resilience will come from embedding cyber risk management in infrastructure procurement decisions, in regional trade facilitation programmes, and in the training of port and maritime personnel.
A practical roadmap for implementation
A practical pathway starts with an audit and planning phase, followed by a phased investment and harmonisation cycle. In the first six to twelve months, states should commission risk assessments and table national maritime cyber strategies that are interoperable with regional plans. Over the following two to four years, priority investments in network segregation, access control, backup systems and incident response teams should be made, accompanied by regular exercises and public reporting. Throughout this period, regional bodies should convene technical assistance, pool threat intelligence and promote vendor-neutral standards so smaller states are not tied into single suppliers.
Steadying The Course
The shipping industry’s century-old rules do not automatically protect it from threats that move at the speed of code. For Africa, the stakes are high: maritime routes underpin food security, regional trade and national development strategies. But the continent is not starting from scratch. There is an opportunity to adopt and adapt global lessons, to align continental instruments with national practice, and to ensure that investments in ports and logistics are cyber aware by design. Doing so will require political leadership, predictable finance and a willingness to forge partnerships across the public and private divide. The alternative, leaving critical maritime systems exposed — would be to invite a different kind of piracy: one that uses lines of code in place of grappling hooks.
