In a world experiencing tectonic shifts in geopolitical alliances, the question of Africa’s global posture is no longer just rhetorical; it’s strategic. With the rise of China, the resurgence of Russia, and the waning but persistent dominance of Western hegemony, Africa has become a crucial pivot in a rapidly realigning international system. Once viewed through the lens of aid and charity, Africa is increasingly seen as a partner in trade, technology, and security.
But despite this growing attention, the continent’s response has been fragmented, one voice in Addis Ababa, another in Abuja, yet another in Nairobi or Pretoria. This raises a critical question: Can Africa unify its foreign policy to reflect a consolidated vision, or will it continue to oscillate between competing global interests?
READ ALSO: Inside Nigeria’s Foreign Policy: Bridging Africa’s Unity and Citizen Welfare
According to the World Bank’s 2024 Global Economic Prospects Report, geopolitical fragmentation is undermining multilateral cooperation, with low-income countries, many in Africa, caught in the crossfire of big-power rivalries. Africa’s combined GDP exceeds $3.4 trillion, and its population surpasses 1.4 billion, yet the continent holds just 3% of global trade. Meanwhile, Africa’s rich resources, from cobalt and rare earth minerals to oil and gas, are magnets for foreign interest but rarely under unified negotiation terms.
In this climate, the need for Africa to define its own interests on the world stage is urgent, not only for leverage but for survival.
The blueprint for Africa’s unified voice resides in several legal and policy frameworks rooted in the African Union’s Agenda 2063. This ambitious framework outlines the continent’s vision for inclusive and sustainable development and, crucially, calls for a politically united Africa. Aspirations 2 and 3 of Agenda 2063 specifically highlight the necessity of integration and a strong global presence.
The Constitutive Act of the African Union provides the legal foundation for promoting common positions and policy coordination among member states. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), while primarily economic, serves as a potential springboard for broader diplomatic cohesion. The African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance aims to align political standards, while the Abuja Treaty envisioned the creation of an African Economic Community to bolster intra-African cooperation.
Further support for a unified voice can be found in the Sirte Declaration, which sparked the transformation of the Organisation of African Unity into the African Union with a stronger emphasis on peace and security and policy alignment. Additionally, the Common African Position on Climate Change presented a rare but critical moment when Africa negotiated as a single entity on the global stage.
Cracks in the Façade: A Continent of Divergent Voices
Despite these frameworks, implementation has been inconsistent. During the 2022 and 2023 United Nations votes on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, African nations were sharply divided. While 28 voted to condemn the invasion, 17 abstained, and nine either opposed or were absent. Such divisions underscored the continent’s lack of coordinated diplomacy.
The 2024 withdrawals of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger from ECOWAS due to ideological shifts and security concerns further revealed deepening fissures. These countries, leaning toward Russian alliances, created a rift in what was once a relatively unified subregional bloc. Meanwhile, contrasting foreign policy positions during the Israel-Gaza conflict also exposed a fragmented African voice. While South Africa and Algeria called for sanctions against Israel, other countries, such as Morocco had normalised relations with Israel, chose silence.
The Promise of AfCFTA and Economic Diplomacy
Yet not all hope is lost. The African Continental Free Trade Area, operational since 2021 and encompassing 54 of 55 AU member states, signals a shift toward continental cohesion. AfCFTA provides a platform not only for economic integration but also for the alignment of diplomatic and trade policies. It has increasingly featured in negotiations with international partners.
The U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in 2022 saw over $55 billion in pledges, many referencing AfCFTA as a foundation for future cooperation. Likewise, the European Union’s 2023 Africa Strategy prioritised AfCFTA in its development plans. As African nations harmonise their trade policies under this agreement, the pathway toward a unified foreign policy becomes more visible.
Institutional Gaps: Where the Vision Stalls
Despite the frameworks and aspirations, the machinery to implement a unified foreign policy remains underdeveloped. The AU Peace and Security Council, intended to mirror the UN Security Council, lacks enforcement capacity. Its resolutions are often symbolic rather than actionable. Budget constraints are another significant impediment; over 60% of the AU’s 2023 budget was funded by external partners including the European Union, China, and Germany’s GIZ. Such reliance compromises policy independence.
In 2023, proposals emerged for a Pan-African Diplomatic Corps and an AU Diplomatic Academy. These institutions were envisioned to train diplomats and unify protocol standards across member states. However, both remain at the concept stage, pending political will and financial backing.
When Unity Matters
At the COP27 climate summit held in Egypt, Africa attempted to negotiate as a bloc, demanding climate finance and reparations. However, domestic lobbying by international actors and disjointed national interests diluted the common position. Africa received just $29.5 billion in climate finance in 2022, far short of the $277 billion needed annually to meet its goals. The case highlighted how a fragmented voice undermines Africa’s bargaining power, even in areas where it holds the moral high ground.
Envisioning a Unified African Foreign Policy
A unified foreign policy does not demand homogenisation. Rather, it requires coherence, mutual respect, and synchronised strategies. This could manifest through the establishment of a centralised diplomatic bureau within the AU, shared visa policies, uniform legal stances at global platforms like the UN and ICC, and coordinated military doctrines under the African Standby Force. It could also mean a consolidated African stance on emerging global issues such as digital sovereignty, artificial intelligence, and cyber governance.
The dream is of an AU Commission addressing the UN General Assembly with the authority of all member states behind it, not as fragmented entities but as a cohesive force with a singular message and vision.
The call for a unified African foreign policy is neither idealistic nor premature; it is an urgent strategic imperative. Africa possesses the frameworks, the institutions, and increasingly, the economic clout to become a more assertive player in global affairs. However, without the political will, funding, and institutional development to implement these policies, unity will remain a slogan rather than a doctrine.
“Africa First” must be more than a rhetorical flourish. It must become a practical roadmap toward diplomatic solidarity. Only then can Africa speak not in echoes, but in a powerful, singular voice that demands attention, respect, and partnership on the world stage.
Charter on Democracy, and integrating economic tools like AfCFTA with diplomacy, Africa can truly craft a foreign policy that is not only unified but unapologetically African.
