Fifty years ago, in a season marked by Cold War politics and post-colonial fragility, fifteen West African countries came together to sign the Treaty of Lagos on May 28, 1975. With pens poised and promises declared, the founding fathers of ECOWAS envisioned something radical for their time, a united regional bloc rooted in cooperation rather than competition and in African self-determination rather than dependence on external powers. Leaders like Nigeria’s General Yakubu Gowon and Togo’s Gnassingbé Eyadéma imagined a new chapter for a region long divided by artificial borders and colonial economic patterns.
The bloc was conceived not only as a vehicle for economic integration but as a political statement that Africa could and must shape its own destiny. It was also a direct response to the fragmentation that marked the continent’s post-independence years. The idea was simple but ambitious: strengthen regional trade, guarantee free movement, harmonise policies, and ensure peace.
READ ALSO: Africa’s Regional Blocs: Can ECOWAS, EAC, and SADC Deliver?
Over the decades, ECOWAS proved its value as a peacekeeping force. From Liberia in the 1990s to Sierra Leone and The Gambia in more recent years, the bloc sent troops under its ECOMOG and ECOMIL operations to stem civil wars and enforce democratic transitions. For many across West Africa, ECOWAS became a symbol of African solidarity, stepping in when national governments collapsed or faltered.
But if ECOWAS has been firm on peace, its posture on democracy has been uneven. The bloc gained applause for standing against unconstitutional takeovers in Mali and The Gambia but drew criticism for its silence on third-term bids in Côte d’Ivoire and Guinea, where constitutional amendments allowed leaders to extend their stay in office. To many observers, ECOWAS seemed selective, bold when condemning juntas, but quiet when democracy was subverted through legal loopholes.
This inconsistency has cost the bloc political capital. In places where trust in regional institutions was already thin, it fed into growing disillusionment, especially among the youth, who viewed ECOWAS as an elite club that protects presidents more than people.
The Coup Cloud and the Sahel Split
In the last five years, a dangerous pattern has returned to the region: the rise of military coups. From Mali to Guinea and Burkina Faso to Niger, juntas have toppled elected governments, citing corruption, insecurity, and foreign interference. ECOWAS responded with sanctions, ultimatums, and threats of military intervention, but its authority was no longer absolute.
Rather than backing down, three countries, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, announced their withdrawal from ECOWAS in 2024 and launched a rival alliance: the Alliance of Sahel States. They accused ECOWAS of acting at the behest of Western powers and failing to provide meaningful support against the jihadist insurgencies plaguing the Sahel.
Now, at 50, the bloc faces one of its biggest existential threats: a region that seems to be fracturing, not uniting. Diplomatic efforts to bring the trio back are ongoing, with ECOWAS offering a transition window until mid-2025, but the political wound is deep and the ideological split even deeper.
The Stories of Those Who Walk the ECOWAS Talk
Beyond the press conferences and summits, there are millions of West Africans who live the ECOWAS promise every day: traders, students, transporters, and workers who cross borders in search of better lives. For them, ECOWAS is not a lofty acronym; it is the right to move, to dream, and to hustle across nations.
The ECOWAS Brown Card Insurance Scheme, launched in 1982, has helped traders and motorists move goods across borders with uniform insurance coverage. For regional truck drivers and commercial operators, this has significantly eased the cost and complexity of transnational movement. It is one of the clearest examples of how policy can touch lives quietly but meaningfully.
Similarly, the Abidjan–Lagos Corridor project, an ambitious six-lane highway linking five coastal states, stands as a symbol of what regional integration could look like on the ground: concrete, connecting, and transformative. The West African Power Pool, aimed at sharing electricity among nations, has helped reduce blackouts in some parts of the region, though massive infrastructural deficits remain.
These are the quiet successes, not flashy, but tangible. Yet they remain under-communicated, drowned out by political headlines and security crises.
Power, Projects, and Political Will
ECOWAS has also pursued more ambitious economic ideas. Chief among them is the introduction of a single regional currency, the ECO, which has been in the pipeline for decades but remains stalled. The lack of fiscal coordination, macroeconomic imbalances, and competing national interests have slowed down its implementation, turning what was meant to be a landmark into a long wait.
But if monetary union remains a dream, energy cooperation is inching forward. The West African Gas Pipeline, stretching from Nigeria to Ghana, and regional electricity pooling initiatives show glimpses of long-term strategic thinking.
Still, these gains demand political will, and that’s where ECOWAS struggles. The bloc’s institutional structures often lack the enforcement power to ensure that member states implement agreed reforms. And without binding mechanisms, integration is too often voluntary and thus, inconsistent.
ECOWAS vs. The World
In the wider geopolitical chessboard, ECOWAS operates in a crowded field. The African Union sets continental norms. Foreign powers like France, the US, China, and increasingly Russia jostle for influence in West Africa. Each crisis, whether in Mali or Niger, becomes a tug-of-war between local agency and global interest.
ECOWAS’s future relevance hinges on its ability to represent the region on its own terms. It must evolve from being a forum of presidents to becoming a bloc of people inclusive, accountable, and truly pan-African in spirit.
Does West Africa Still Trust ECOWAS?
Trust is fragile. Among citizens, particularly youth, many now question whether ECOWAS truly represents their aspirations. For farmers hit by border closures, students stuck in visa delays, or entrepreneurs crushed by inconsistent trade policies, the ECOWAS dream can feel distant.
Yet, there remains a reservoir of goodwill. Many still believe in the idea of a united West Africa, one that defends democracy, champions African-led development, and protects its people from both internal decay and external manipulation. The question is whether ECOWAS is ready to renew its compact with the people.
The Next 50: Renewal or Rupture?
As ECOWAS marks its golden jubilee, it faces a historic crossroad. Its foundations remain strong, but cracks in leadership, security, and unity have exposed vulnerabilities. While the vision of regional integration and peace is still alive, the bloc must confront its execution challenges head-on to remain relevant and effective in the years ahead.
The future of ECOWAS depends on humility, innovation, and a renewed commitment to the founding spirit of unity. West Africa’s vast potential, its youth, resources, and cultural richness cannot be left behind. If revitalised, ECOWAS can continue to be the bridge that binds the region together, not through force, but through shared faith in a common destiny.
In this critical moment, the leadership of H.E. Bola Ahmed Tinubu, elected Chairman of the ECOWAS Authority in July 2023, is crucial. As the bloc navigates ongoing security and political challenges, bold and inclusive action is essential to restore confidence and fulfil the promise of 50 years of collaboration and progress.
