The carbon credit market has recently become one of the most debated and controversial mechanisms in global climate policy. For Africa, the story is complex, both a potential opportunity for economic growth and a challenge to environmental integrity. While its share of global emissions is relatively low, the continent is highly exposed to climate risks even as a supplier of one of the most valuable resources in the fight against climate change. However, this delicate balancing act raises a crucial question: Is Africa’s carbon credit market truly reflecting the value of its environmental assets.
Carbon credits, a core component of carbon trading systems, allow countries, companies, and organisations to offset their carbon emissions by investing in carbon-reducing projects, such as reforestation or renewable energy. The idea behind carbon trading is simple: reduce carbon emissions where it is most cost-effective, while investing in environmental protection elsewhere. In theory, it is a win-win, but the real-world application is far more nuanced.
READ ALSO: Green is the New Gold: Africa’s Growing Carbon Credit Economy
According to Statista, the value of the global carbon market reached a record high of 881 billion euros (949 billion U.S. dollars) in 2023, and Africa has been increasingly involved in this trade. The continent is home to vast forests, extensive wildlife reserves, and growing renewable energy projects, making it an attractive player in the carbon credit market. From 2015 to 2022, the volume of carbon credits issued in Africa grew significantly, with estimates indicating that the continent’s contribution to the global carbon market was worth over $300 million by the end of 2022. In particular, countries like Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia have leveraged their natural resources to generate carbon credits that they sell on the international market.
Despite the opportunities, there is growing concern about the pricing of these credits. For instance, in 2022, carbon credits from projects in African countries were sold at an average of $3 to $5 per tonne of carbon dioxide removed, a fraction of what credits from European or North American projects can fetch, which can be upwards of $20 per tonne. The question arises: are these low prices undermining the potential of the continent to generate wealth while fighting climate change?
Africa’s Riches in Carbon: A Blessing or a Curse?
Africa’s vast natural resources, its forests, wetlands, and wildlife are a goldmine for carbon credit generation. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), for example, is home to the world’s second-largest rainforest, which has been central to carbon sequestration efforts. Similarly, the Great Green Wall Initiative, which spans 11 countries in the Sahel, aims to restore millions of hectares of land, promoting biodiversity and storing carbon. These efforts, while commendable, have not been without controversy, especially regarding how the proceeds from the sale of carbon credits are distributed.
In some cases, the low prices at which Africa’s carbon credits are sold reflect the lack of bargaining power and oversight in the sector. The result is that many African nations are not reaping the full economic potential of their carbon assets. The argument here is that Africa, despite being a leader in carbon sequestration efforts, is undervalued in the global carbon credit market. In many instances, local communities and indigenous populations, whose land is often used for carbon offset projects, see little benefit from the sale of carbon credits, as most of the proceeds go to foreign companies or international investors.
One prime example is the Kenya-based Kenya Agricultural Carbon Project, which works with smallholder farmers to help them adopt sustainable farming techniques that generate carbon credits. While the project has been successful in terms of environmental benefits, reports show that the financial returns to local farmers have been limited, despite the carbon credits earning millions on the international market. Similarly, in Uganda, large-scale reforestation projects aimed at sequestering carbon have led to land disputes, as local communities often lose access to land that is designated for carbon offset projects.
The Price of Air: Low Carbon Credit Prices and Africa’s Future
The carbon credit market in Africa is currently experiencing a paradox: the continent offers vast potential for carbon offsetting projects, but it is struggling to secure fair compensation for its environmental services. In 2022, carbon credit prices for African projects averaged only $3 to $5 per tonne of CO₂, significantly lower than the prices in other regions. For comparison, the price for European carbon credits averaged $40 per tonne in the same period. This disparity in prices is partly due to the limited demand for credits from Africa, the complexity of verifying projects, and the lack of a unified regulatory framework.
The African Union (AU) has recognised this issue and, in 2022, proposed creating a unified framework to regulate carbon credit trading on the continent. However, the implementation of such policies is still in its infancy. In addition, the global carbon credit market remains largely dominated by European and North American entities, which possess the resources to create high-quality, verifiable carbon projects that can command higher prices.
There are several factors contributing to the low price of African carbon credits. One is the underdeveloped nature of carbon markets in many African countries. Limited infrastructure for monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of carbon offset projects has led to concerns about the quality and transparency of African carbon credits. While countries like Kenya and Ethiopia have made strides in improving their MRV systems, the lack of technical capacity in other regions hampers the potential for higher credit prices.
Moreover, the political and economic instability in some African countries further complicates the issue. In nations experiencing conflict or poor governance, the sale of carbon credits can be seen as a short-term fix that offers little long-term development for local communities. The Democratic Republic of Congo, for example, has been criticised for selling carbon credits from its rainforests without clear benefits for its citizens, who continue to suffer from poverty and lack of access to essential services.
The Battle for Fair Compensation
To understand the stakes more clearly, consider the case of the Kasigau Corridor project in Kenya. This carbon offset project, one of the largest in the country, is a partnership between the wildlife conservation group Wildlife Works and international carbon markets. The project has been successful in protecting large areas of forest and wildlife habitats while generating millions of dollars through carbon credits. However, critics argue that the profits from the sale of these credits do not adequately trickle down to the local communities, whose lives are directly impacted by the conservation efforts.
Another case to examine is the Maloti-Drakensberg mountain range in South Africa. The area, which is home to critical biodiversity, was the site of a major carbon offset project that failed to deliver promised economic benefits to the local population. The project was initially lauded for its potential to sequester significant amounts of carbon, but due to mismanagement and lack of transparency, the community saw little financial gain from the sale of carbon credits.
Ensuring Fair Value for Africa’s Carbon
Africa’s involvement in the carbon credit market is a double-edged sword. On one hand, the continent’s vast natural resources present significant opportunities to contribute to global climate change efforts. On the other hand, the current system often leaves African nations at a disadvantage, with little power to negotiate fair prices for their carbon credits.
To address these challenges, experts argue that Africa must push for stronger regulatory frameworks that ensure carbon credits are sold at fair prices. These frameworks should prioritise local communities, ensuring that the benefits of carbon credits flow directly to those whose land is used for environmental projects. In addition, African countries need to invest in capacity-building initiatives that strengthen their monitoring and verification systems, ensuring that projects are credible and deliver real climate benefits.
Moreover, there is a need for greater cooperation among African nations to create a unified carbon credit market. A regional approach to carbon trading could provide more leverage in negotiations with international buyers, ensuring that Africa receives fair compensation for its environmental assets.
A Delicate Balance
As Africa continues to navigate the complexities of the carbon credit market, it faces a delicate balancing act. The continent has an undeniable role to play in the global fight against climate change, but it must also ensure that it is not being exploited in the process. It is essential that Africa’s carbon credits are sold at a price that reflects the true value of the continent’s natural resources and the work done to protect them. By strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving transparency, and ensuring that local communities benefit, Africa can turn its environmental assets into a powerful force for sustainable development.
Ultimately, the question remains: Is Africa selling its air too cheap? In some cases, the answer may be yes, but with the right reforms and investments, Africa can secure a fairer share of the carbon credit market, one that benefits both the environment and its people.
